Monday, October 31, 2011

Are Lisa Manzella’s “Investigation” Cries Justified - or Political Publicity Stunts?

HAPPY HALLOWEEN!

First, we want to clear up something we posted last time.  In our October 26th report, we mentioned that Shelby Township Trustee Lisa Manzella was gearing up for a planned campaign for Shelby Township Treasurer.  After we raised this possibility, we received the following e-mail (which made us smile):

“To the liars at the inside out.  Lisa Manzella is great!!!!!!!!!!!! !! !!  She is a real conservative, not like those other fakes on the Board.  You have no proof about your claim that she wants to be Treasurer, and are just trying to smear this fine lady.  If you have proof, show it.”

Your wish is our command.  Here is the proof you requested to see:

Now what do you think?  Are we lying just to try and smear this “fine lady”?

Advantage Associates is a Lansing-based communications firm.  Interestingly, a few hours after the company announced their “proud” support of Manzella for Treasurer via Facebook and Twitter, both proclamations mysteriously disappeared.  POOF!  Was it a premature leak that Manzella didn’t want exposed since she had not yet made her intentions public? 

So what is the connection here?  On the Advantage Associates website you will find the name Joseph Manzella as one of the firm’s employees.  Any relation?  You bet.  Joseph Manzella is Lisa’s son.  Now the endorsement makes sense.  What isn’t clear is why Manzella’s name was quickly dropped.

Just imagine what Shelby Township would look like today if Lisa Manzella has been our township Treasurer for the past several years. 
• Lisa Manzella supported $50 million in new bonds/taxes for her “campus”.
• Manzella advocated millions in new spending, including $20 million for an unaffordable “justice center”.
• Manzella said the people should not have the right to vote on new bonds/taxes, going so far as to call any decision to give it to the people “cowardice.”  (see Manzella e-mail to resident Ed Young at right.  Click on the e-mail to see a larger version).
• Manzella has consistently opposed efforts to expose the high costs of union pensions.
• Manzella criticizes Treasurer Viar for his exposé about union pensions — perhaps not wanting to upset her friends/supporters in the union?
• Manzella has said it is better to spend tax money than save it in the bank.  This comment quickly brought criticism from other township Trustees as well as taxpayers.  Manzella has always wanted to spend money, and as Treasurer she will control the checkbook.  Can we afford that risk?
• Manzella once said, while complaining about her fellow Trustees, “actions speak louder than words.”  Well, one look at Manzella’s public record will prove that her actions as Treasurer would be devastating to our township, and would take Shelby back to the days (or just four years ago) when our township was teetering on bankruptcy, facing huge deficits, and heading toward higher taxes to pay for ever-rising spending.

Treasurer Lisa Manzella?  It may sound like a joke, but this is no joking matter.  Shelby taxpayers cannot afford to give Manzella these responsibilities.  She has indicated that she no longer wants to serve on the township Board, so given this attitude why should we trust her with our township’s finances?

Shelby residents know how Lisa Manzella loves to call for “investigations.”  Most recently, Manzella did this when she threatened to file a complaint with the Michigan State Police over what Treasurer Paul Viar called “banker box gate.”  This “banker box” investigation call eerily resembles a complaint that Manzella filed with the Macomb County Prosecutor back in 2009 over what she claimed was an Open Meetings Act violation by the Board of Trustees.

Manzella’s Open Meetings violation got her some favorable publicity to advance her personal agenda.  Here is how the Macomb Daily covered the story:

Manzella tried to play up this alleged scandal big time.  Her goal was clearly to try and paint the Board of Trustees as violating Michigan’s open meetings law.

Did her scheme work?  Two weeks later, Macomb Daily reporter Frank DeFrank wrote the following:

Feeling stung (and perhaps a little embarrassed) that they gut sucked into by Manzella’s publicity stunt, three days later the Macomb Daily wrote the following editorial:

Manzella’s open meetings complaint was thrown out as baseless.  We applaud the Macomb Daily for calling Manzella out on this when they wrote the following:
“...An agenda format is not required.  Consequently, omissions, errors or amendments to a published agenda do not constitute violations of the Open Meetings Act.
“Manzella probably could have come to the same conclusion [that what the Board did was legal] if she had taken time to research the act before going to the Prosecutor’s Office.”
“And lesson No. 2 is for Manzella, who left the meeting early and prior to the discussion of layoffs.  Don’t excuse yourself early and then complain about what happens in your absence.”

Even though she loves to demand investigations, Manzella doesn’t take the time to investigate the facts of an issue herself.  For example, when Manzella called for a State Police investigation over “banker box gate”, she obviously hadn’t investigated the facts before making that knee-jerk remark.  If she had she would have realized how the whole FOIA break-in story by Clerk Terri Kowal stunk to high heaven.

First Clerk Kowal said, publicly and on television, that she filed a police report because someone was going through her stuff.  Then, after it became clear that there was no police report filed, Kowal’s response was that she filed a verbal report.  Initially, according to Kowal, it was a cardboard banker box with string around the ends sitting under her Deputy Clerk’s desk.   However, a few days later, according to Manzella, it became a break-in of “locked file drawers.”

Mrs. Kowal was clearly uncomfortable discussing the FOIA issue and the whole police report aspect of it.  Why?  Was the entire claim a fraud?  How did Manzella come to the conclusion that a cardboard banker box was really locked file drawers?  Who could have told Manzella to make that unfounded claim?  Who should we believe?  Kowal?  Manzella?  Neither?

Despite her proclamation that she would file a written complaint with the Michigan State Police over this the morning after the Tuesday, October 18th Board meeting, Manzella did nothing.  Why bother to announce that you are going to file a Michigan State police complaint, and then fail to follow through?  Was this just an attempt by Lisa Manzella to, hopefully, get a headline or two in one of the local newspapers (as she did with the open meetings issue) to help her political agenda?

Did the publicity stunt work?  Considering the lack of attention that her call for an “investigation” garnered in the press, it appears that Manzella’s plot failed.  Even the Macomb Daily refused to take the bait this time around, opting only to give Manzella’s State Police angle a passing reference in a larger story about the Board removing FOIA duties from Clerk Kowal after she misused the process for her own political agenda.

Lisa Manzella’s constant lies have worn thin with a majority of Shelby taxpayers.  Her support of the recent failed recalls has shown her true political intentions.  Her credibility is waning with her colleagues due to her constant nasty personal attacks on the Board of Trustees.  And now that reporters (once favorable to her) are no longer buying her snake oil, Manzella is purely a lone wolf howling off in the distance.  She may not realize it, but time is quickly running out for Lisa Manzella.

Tick...tick...tick...tick.

Until next time...

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Shelby Trustee Lisa Manzella Advocates Retroactive Ticket Writing As A Way To Raise Revenue For Skyrocketing Union Pensions?

Shelby Township Trustee Lisa Manzella, the lead proponent of the “Save Shelby, Status Quo, Liberal Spending Liars Society” (aka Save Shelby), never ceases to amaze us.  Just when you think things can’t get any stranger, Manzella ups the ante and does something more unusual than before.  Her newest antic: attacking Shelby Township Treasurer Paul Viar (again) over an unwarranted ticket that he recently received.

Treasurer Viar wrote a letter to the Source newspaper detailing the facts surrounding his handicapped parking ticket incident.  On the face of it (as it was reported in the newspapers), the issue seemed cut and dry.  But, as Paul Harvey would say, “Now, for the rest of the story.”

When you get below the surface and understand the complete details about what really happened, the ticket issued to Mr. Viar stinks of retaliation.  The process by which Mr. Viar was issued this ticket raises serious ethical questions among those of us who live, work, drive and pay taxes here in Shelby Township.

We are reprinting Mr. Viar’s letter to the editor below.  We encourage you to read the letter and judge for yourself whether or not this retroactive parking ticket was justified.  The letter appeared in the October 10, 2011 Source newspaper.
_____ 

To the editor: Won’t be intimidated
Published: October 10, 2011

All Shelby Township residents want a strong police department. This is the backbone of a dynamic community, where residents feel safe to go about their daily business. As township treasurer, I have worked to help make sure our township's police officers have the tools and training to protect the public. I have also done my part, as a voice of the people, to make sure that we reduce the costs wherever possible, thus protecting the pocketbooks of taxpayers.

Recently an incident occurred which, in my mind, calls into questions how some township police officers have chosen to do their job and enforce the law. I am talking about a situation that took place at Chase Bank on Monday, Sept. 19.

While I was depositing tax receipts, retired Shelby police officer Ken Underwood called the township to complain that the car I was driving was parked in a handicapped spot. Mr. Underwood proceeded to raise this issue at the Tuesday, Sept. 20 Board of Trustees meeting, when he came to the podium to attack me. I am not complaining about Mr. Underwood's free speech rights; as a public official I am open to criticism. However, democracy allows me to tell the whole story since Mr. Underwood left out details which weakens his message.

Underwood's contention was, and is, that I do not have the right to park in a handicapped spot. Therefore, he demanded that I receive a parking ticket. Even after I displayed my handicapped permit, Underwood protested and demanded that I be issued a ticket for illegally parking in a handicapped spot.

Two days after the meeting where Underwood made his appearance, and three days after the alleged illegal parking incident took place, guess what. A ticket was written against me claiming that I violated the law by parking in the handicapped spot. Even though I have the legal right to do so, and have the permit to prove it, police officer (C. Johnson) issued me a retroactive parking ticket, which also included Mr. Underwood's signature. The citation was sent by registered mail paid for by the taxpayer.

This strange action by these police officers should alarm everyone, both resident and non-resident alike, who drives in our township. What are we to make of a retired police officer engaging in a ticket-writing scheme to harass drivers for legal conduct? Does this policy of writing unwarranted retroactive tickets apply only to me, or is this a police department policy? Is this, somehow, related to my votes as treasurer? Have other motorists received retroactive tickets like this, or am I being singled out?

More to the point, if some police officers decide to issue me a ticket three days after an alleged incident occurs, how far back could some police officers go to issue retroactive tickets? One week? One month? One year? Six years? What is the township's statute of limitations when it comes to writing these retroactive tickets?

Shelby Township residents know that I have been a prime target of the police union over the past several months. Some police union members, including Mr. Underwood, have come forth at televised Board of Trustees meetings to personally attack me and call me malicious names - words I will not reprint. I have been threatened repeatedly and even once by Mr. Underwood, at a televised meeting, to meet him in the parking lot for a "conversation." I was the subject of a malicious recall campaign by these same union members who want me removed to silence any discussion about budget-busting unsustainable pensions.

There is a clear pattern here. I was falsely attacked during their failed recall. I have been personally smeared at televised board meetings for speaking out about police pensions. Please know this: I cite names of pension recipients only after they have exposed their names to the press or at board meetings. Now I am being retroactively attacked by the police union and being issued a retroactive ticket for parking in a handicapped spot, even though I have the legal right to do so.

Given the union's ongoing pattern of behavior, I believe that I am target of police harassment. The police union is angry because I have chosen to tell taxpayers the true cost of their jackpot pensions. The union is angry because the Board of Trustees, including myself, asked them to accept nine modifications to their contract to help Shelby Township during these economic times. The union responded by suing the arbitrator to stop the changes. Finally, the union is angry at me because I have refused to cave to their campaign of humiliation.

If some police union members can get away with writing unfounded parking tickets against me to even a score or satisfy some kind of grudge or personal vendetta, what does this mean for our township? If I am the target of these activities today, will you be targeted tomorrow? Given this obvious pattern of harassment against me by the police union, will it require a lawsuit to stop this union harassment once and for all?

Everyone who is concerned about the values of democracy in our township should be forewarned. Speaking up for needed changes, speaking out to protect the interests and pocketbooks of taxpayers, and protesting union bullying can and most likely will get you in trouble. Nevertheless, I will not be intimidated by those who will use any, and all, means necessary to try and silence me.

Paul Viar, Shelby Township Treasurer
_____

WOW!  Reading Treasurer Viar’s letter raises serious questions.  Is this the policy of the police department, go after people a few days or weeks after something happens, or is this a selective policy used against certain people (or elected officials) in the township?

What amazed us is how Trustee Lisa Manzella immediately jumped into this discussion.  In the interest of fairness we are reprinting Manzella’s response.  When you read it you will likely find yourself shaking your head in bewilderment at Manzella’s attack against Mr. Viar.
_____
To the editor: Treasurer needs to accept responsibility
Mr. Viar’s letter to the editor in last week's edition of The Source is another example of how he can “dish it out, but he can’t take it,” as well as the entitlement he expects and demands.

It is illegal to park in a handicap parking spot if you do not display a handicap permit in the rearview mirror or on the license plate. Township vehicles do not have handicap plates.  Even if you have a handicap permit, it is not an excuse; you need to have it on display to be in compliance with the law. I am certain Mr. Viar was given that information by the Secretary of State's office when, or if, he received his permit.

It is becoming commonplace for police departments to have cameras at intersections to track cars going through red lights and in some desert communities planes track speeding cars.  Some communities enlist senior citizens to take pictures of the plates and dashboards of cars illegally parked in handicapped spots, and the car owner receives a ticket in the mail.

Mr. Viar knows that as an elected official he could not be reprimanded as an employee would. What would the board have done if one of the employees parked a car in a handicapped spot with no visible permit?  Surely they would have been written up and this info would be part of their permanent work record, and likely get a ticket.

I have a close family member who qualifies for a handicapped permit. She has children that she has to carpool. I can assure you that if she forgot her permit, she would not park in a handicapped-accessible spot. And, if by some stretch of the imagine she did, she would, as Mr. Viar should have, apologize to the person pointing it out or to the officers who issued the ticket. An explanation of forgetting the permit is pretty easy for anyone to understand. Had Mr. Viar responded with a statement like, "I'm so sorry, I was in a hurry to get back to my office and serve the community, I inadvertently left my handicap permit in my car," this would not have become an issue.

All Mr. Viar has to do is take his ticket, and his permit, to the court to get the fine reduced.

Once again, in order to cover up his own wrongdoing, Mr. Viar chooses to blame everyone else rather than take responsibility for his own actions. Mr. Viar is a professional at slinging blame elsewhere; you can see it at every board meeting.  He always fails to mention that he has served on the Police and Fire Pension Board for 12 years, yet he complains constantly that the pensions are too high.  Mr. Viar, man up and take responsibility for your own actions - for the people who want to lawfully use the handicapped parking to the residents who want the facts on all the issues.

Lisa Manzella, Shelby Township
_____

Excuse our French, but what the hell is Lisa Manzella talking about?  Dish it out but can’t take it?  Unless our memory is incorrect, Mr. Viar has taken quite a number of unwarranted hits from Manzella and her recall crew over the last few months.  If there is anyone who can dish it out (but can’t take it) it is Manzella.  She has the audacity to complain about our blog, and yet feels she should have free reign to smear and trash anyone she pleases?  Manzella is, without question, the consummate cry baby!

She claims that Mr. Viar must accept responsibility?  Mr. Viar has the legal right to park in a handicapped space.  How do we know? Because he has a handicapped permit.  What the police did to Mr. Viar is wrong.  So who should really take responsibility here?

Mr. Viar took Manzella to about her letter during the October 18th Board meeting.  Here is what Mr. Viar said:

=====

Treasurer Paul Viar’s comments
Tuesday, October 18th Board of Trustees meeting

I begin by trying to clear up some questions concerning a parking ticket that I receive a few weeks ago.  This ticket was issued to me, on the word of a retired police officer, who had no evidence of facts.  This officer has attended two Board meetings to express his displeasure with me for explaining to Shelby taxpayers the threat posed to our township by the current unsustainable police union pensions.  So we must assume that he had an axe to grind.

I was getting questions about the ticket, so I wrote a letter to the Source explaining the details of this parking ticket incident.  I explained how I thought this was a highly unusual circumstance in the way the ticket was issued.

The ticket was not given to me in the traditional manner.  It was written by an officer who did not see the incident, but who took the word of a retired officer and sent a ticket to me certified mail, paid for by taxpayers.  I accepted this citation, contacted my attorney, and a pre-trial court hearing was held last Thursday.  At no time in these proceedings did I mention the name of Lisa Manzella.  My concern has been focused on the practice of issuing retroactive tickets.

However, Mrs. Manzella decided to write a scathing letter about me as a follow up to my letter.  She said, in this letter ,that I had not manned up.  As I said, I took this ticket to my attorney and we set up a court date.

Obviously Mrs. Manzella would like to compare  my ticket to her contact with police sometime ago, so let’s do that.  Mrs. Manzella ends her letter by saying residents want the facts on all issues.  Here are some of the facts concerning Mrs. Manzella’s contact with the Shelby Township police.

Her response to the press after the one-car accident was “accidents happen.”

In my view, accidents of this nature, where you cross a center line of a two-lane road, roll your SUV, end up with the nose of your vehicle in a ditch at 1:00 a.m. on a Sunday morning deserves more than a flippant “accidents happen” comment.

I would like to read from a deposition taken from an officer the night of the accident:

QUESTION: You concluded she wasn’t wearing a seat belt, Mrs. Manzella?
OFFICER:  That’s correct.
QUESTION: You didn’t issue a citation for not wearing a seat belt, did you?
OFFICER: No, I did not.
QUESTION:  Why not?
OFFICER: I don’t know why.

Any remarks about Mrs. Manzella that I have made, either positive or negative, have been made at these meetings for residents to hear and evaluate for themselves.  My comments have been remarks about her record, her actions, and her votes on issues impacting taxpayers.  By contrast, over the past several months, Mrs. Manzella has chosen to use social media sites, like Facebook, to malign me and call me names that are not used in mixed company.

In trying to explain her rationale for a retroactive ticket-writing scheme, Manzella compares Shelby Township to a desert community that uses airplanes to track speeders.  She says traffic cameras at intersections are being used to track speeders.  She even says that some communities pay people to go around taking photos of cars to issue tickets.  Is this her plan for our township?

=====

We find it unbelievable that Lisa Manzella wants to engage in a public debate about tickets.  As mentioned by Treasurer Viar at the October 18, 2011 Board meeting, Manzella did not receive a ticket for her one-car accident in 2005? She could have, but did not.  Manzella confirmed that she did not receive a ticket in the October 13, 2005 story in the Macomb Daily (see graphic at right).

Mr. Viar pointed out that a police office who was on the scene of the accident that night, was asked (under oath) why Manzella did not receive a seat belt ticket.  His response: “I don’t know why.”

Think about it.  If you are pulled over and are not wearing a seat belt, you will probably get a ticket.  If a politician, like Lisa Manzella, can get out of receiving a ticket, why can’t ordinary taxpayers?

Just like Manzella, we too have close friends who are current and former police officers.  So we value their advice.  When they heard the story of Mr. Viar’s ticket incident, one thing we kept hearing over and over was: “the police can’t do that.”

We have been advised that Michigan requires that in order for a handicapped parking ticket to be legally written, a responding officer MUST  witness the infraction.  In this case, the police officer who issued the ticket did not see it himself, but instead took the word of a retired officer.  The ticket was sent certified mail, paid for by taxpayers.  How often does this take place in Shelby Township?

Some of the other points Manzella raises in her letter to try and justify this retroactive ticket were laughable and, quite frankly, irrelevant:
• Intersection cameras to catch red light runners?  Sure, some communities use them, even though the continued maintenance required on these cameras has become a severe drain on dwindling municipal resources.  Plus, many of these cameras have come under fire for being unreliable - perhaps due to lax maintenance.  What do red lights have to do with a parking ticket discussion anyway?
• Airplanes to monitor speeding motorists?  Yes, this may be used in “desert communities” but how does this apply to Shelby Township?  Our township is not a desert community, and our police department can hardly afford to purchase an airplane for traffic patrols.  So what’s the point?
• Paying people to take photos for tickets?  This is the most bizarre idea Manzella raises.  Do we really need a private shutterbug force (of seniors?) walking around taking photos so that retroactive tickets can be written and sent to people?  Is this prudent or wise?

This latest Manzellian attack upon Treasurer Viar indicates just how out of touch with reality Lisa Manzella has become.  Her nasty political attacks have become a tiresome display of desperation.  Manzella is so fed up with public service (as evidenced by her numerous Internet rants) that the only tool left in her toolbox these days is attacking other people.  Even if she knows nothing about the topic at hand, she complains, gripes, and distorts the facts to meet her own views.  This is unhealthy — both for Manzella and for our township.

Given all this, and her continued weird and unexplained actions, we should all do Mrs. Manzella a favor and kick her out of office in 2012.  Whether she runs for Treasurer (as she is now telling people) or runs for another term as Trustee, her negative attitude is doing more harm that good, and we should tell Manzella (very clearly by our votes) that it would be best if she retired.  This way, she can go back to commenting on Facebook full-time and leave the responsibilities of public service to those elected officials who take the concerns of township taxpayers seriously.

Until next time...

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

FOIA, Foibles, Falsehoods and Fantasies: A Pretty Typical Day in the Lives of Shelby Politicians Terri Kowal and Lisa Manzella

The Inside Out previously reported how and why the Shelby Board of Trustees voted to modify the township’s freedom of information act (FOIA) policy.

Due to allegations of FOIA abuse/misuse by Clerk Terri Kowal, the Board voted UNANIMOUSLY at its October 4th meeting to transfer all Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) duties to the township’s Human Resources Director.  The motion was made by Treasurer Paul Viar, supported by Trustee Paula Filar and approved by ALL SEVEN Board members.

This issued appeared settled, since everyone on the Board concurred, on October 4th, that the decision was wise and prudent, especially given the enormous time burden FOIA supposedly poses to Clerk Terri Kowal and her “overworked” and “understaffed” department.

However, the FOIA topic resurfaced at the Tuesday, October 18th Board of Trustees meeting.  It was a last-minute agenda addition by Trustee Lisa Manzella backed by Clerk Terri Kowal.  Why Kowal and Manzella would decide to revisit a motion that they both enthusiastically supported on October 4th seemed strange.  Manzella previously said she would have no problem with the FOIA duties going to the HR Department, and Kowal said she would be happy to send the work to another department.

So what happened over the last two weeks?  Can you say POLITICS!  As Ronald Reagan once said: “There you go again” Mr. Carter…um….we mean ... Mrs. Manzella.

Manzella said she added this to the agenda because she did not feel comfortable with the vote she cast.  On October 4th she was emphatic that she had no problem transferring these responsibilities to another department.  She didn’t hesitate for one second in supporting the FOIA policy modification.

So what happened?  Manzella said she didn’t know enough about the issue when she voted, but went ahead and voted for the change anyway?

“After investigation and careful consideration, I believe that the responsibility should remain with the Clerk’s office as it has for years [Manzella’s status quo mentality].  The currently understaffed HR department should not be saddled with the responsibility of a FOIA request. This decision was made in haste, under pressure at the last Board meeting.”

We watched the October 4th meeting and there was absolutely no pressure put on anyone, at any time, to make the FOIA change.  On October 18th Manzella went on to complain that this decision was brought forth in an “attempt to circumvent transparency and keep certain items from public view.”

She then went on to claim that after the policy switch Supervisor Rick Stathakis intervened to review FOIA requests and their proposed replies.  Manzella, in a classic Maccarone-style political statement, clearly tried to create the image, in the minds of those watching, that Mr. Stathakis was doing something devious to undercut the FOIA process.

Wait a minute!  What did Manzella just say?

Supervisor Stathakis jumped in to interrupt Manzella on the spot.  He called Manzella’s comment about the Supervisor trying to take control of the FOIA process “completely false.”  Clearly, Mr. Stathakis decided it was time to stand up and stop the Manzellian madness.

Mr. Stathakis called the township’s HR Director up to the podium to help clarify the facts.  He asked the HR Director if he has intervened in anyway, at any time, to tell her what to do or not to do with regards to the FOIA process.  The HR Director’s answer was NO.

“Where this information comes from, I don’t know, but this is exactly why I think we need to have an independent source, such as the HR Director, looking at it.  I’m sorry about the interruption Mrs. Manzella but that was just plain untrue,” Mr. Stathakis said.

Manzella continued reading her script.  She said that since the HR Director is under the Supervisor’s direction, that may be where the “confusion” came from about the Supervisor’s meddling. 

Supervisor Stathakis immediately stopped her again.

“That is a big leap from me looking at documents, and I just want to bring this up so that folks out there [watching on television] can understand…By her [the HR Director] being under my supervision is a big, big, big big leap from looking at documents.  This kind of misinformation that’s going around, I mean, this is how it starts. So I’m glad that you brought this up for discussion so we can make the record clear.”

Manzella continued.  She then claimed that, as was pointed out at the October 4th Board meeting, somebody (her assertion was Mr. Viar or Mrs. Filar) went into locked, file drawers in the clerk’s office to tamper with documents. 

Locked file drawers?  WTF?????   This was mentioned at the October 4th meeting?  Sorry Lisa, but that is just not true.  This was the first time the notion of breaking into locked drawers had come up.

When pressed to explain this situation on October 4th, Terri Kowal said, on the record, that somebody went into a banker box that was under her Deputy Clerk’s desk.  We wrote about this in our October 13th Inside Out.  Mrs. Kowal said, very clearly, that it was a banker’s box “with thread around the end, you know string around the ends.”  Kowal never once said locked file drawers.  Now, according to Mrs. Manzella, somebody physically broke into locked drawers and tampered with an e-mail.

Okay, so which is it?  Locked file drawers or a banker box with string?  Does anyone really know?  Anyone?  Bueller?  Anyone?

Manzella said the reason she didn’t want the HR Department to do the FOIA work is because they are “understaffed.”  So while Mrs. Manzella is concerned about overworking the HR Department with new FOIA duties, she has no problem putting this “burden” back on the Clerk, who has already said, publicly more than once, that her department is understaffed and overworked and would be glad to give these responsibilities to another department.  No consistency of thought at all.

Okay, so now we know why Lisa Manzella wanted this on the agenda.  Manzella wanted to try and spread misinformation around that somebody broke into the clerk’s office and went into locked file drawers to tamper with “official government documents.”

As we said before, can you say POLITICS!!!

This may be important to Kowal and Manzella, but the average taxpayer could care less who actually does the FOIA work, as long as it is done correctly, legally and fairly.  No bias or political games.   However, for Mrs. Kowal and Mrs. Manzella small items like this are a big deal.

Trustee Paula Filar then discussed the FOIA reconsideration motion.  She said she would not support overturning the last vote to give FOIA duties to HR.  Once again she explained how, in her view, Clerk Kowal misused the FOIA process to benefit her political agenda.

Mrs. Filar then went on to address the alleged police report that Mrs. Kowal said she filed.  Mrs. Filar read an e-mail from the Acting Chief which said that their research shows that there was no police report filed by the clerk or her staff related to this incident.

THERE WAS NO POLICE REPORT FILED!!!

Mrs. Filar said she can’t think of a better location for confidential information to be held than in the HR Department.  She said the most important thing about being a FOIA coordinator is confidentiality.  Filar said there is nothing statutory that gives FOIA responsibilities to the clerk, adding that the Board is responsible for appointing a FOIA coordinator.

Filar said she was disturbed that Kowal took information obtained as FOIA coordinator, in this case a private e-mail between Viar and Filar, read the e-mail, didn’t like what it said, made a copy of it (by Kowal’s own admission) and confronted Mr. Viar about the contents of the e-mail.  Mrs. Filar said that in her view, Kowal abused her authority as FOIA clerk.

Mrs. Filar then angrily protested the allegation levied against her at the October 4th meeting by both Kowal and Manzella.  Here is what Mrs. Filar said:

“During the Board's discussion of the last meeting (October 4th), Mrs. Kowal claimed that somebody broke into banker boxes in her office and tampered with an e-mail.  Mrs. Kowal further said, at this same meeting, that she filed a police report about this situation. She subsequently told the newspapers that this police report was filed in August.

“At the same meeting, Mrs. Manzella publicly accused me of being among two individuals, with the other being Mr. Viar, as two individuals who could have reason to break into Mrs. Kowal’s office and tamper with an e-mail.

“I received e-mails and phone calls from a few residents asking what this was all about.  People were wondering if I was the one Mrs. Kowal was referring to with her claim about the police report.

“I need to tell you that I have an e-mail from Acting Chief Woelkers, stating that there has been no police report filed on any incident by the clerk or anyone from her department since the date that she said she filed that police report of August 2011.

“I want to make it perfectly clear that I did not, at any time, do what Mrs. Kowal suggested.  Further I want it to be known that the assumptions made by Mrs. Manzella, piggybacking on what Mrs Kowal said, that I broke into the Clerk's office, are absolutely false.”

Treasurer Viar then asked for the floor to clear up questions about this from his perspective.

“Mr. Chairman, I want to put a little levity on this if I may.  And I want to address what’s being now known as Banker Box Gate.     

“I want to make it clear, for the record, that I did not break into any office, as Mrs. Kowal and Mrs. Manzella have implied, to tamper with any e-mail.  Had I chosen to tamper with an e-mail, I would not have given Mrs. Kowal this e-mail which I display at this time.  Obviously, Mrs. Kowal is not telling the truth about a police report that had been filed.  There has been misinformation about the whole e-mail incident.  The truth is, I’m beginning to believe, you have to wonder, what can you believe out of either of these two people?”

After being confronted about the lack of a police report, Kowal amended her story to say that she gave a verbal police report to the Chief and Captain Woelkers (now the acting Chief).  Then, Kowal stopped and pondered that perhaps, instead of Woelkers, it was Steve Stanberry.  What is Kowal stammering about this time?

If you considered this such an explosive issue, as Kowal apparently does, and went to talk about it with the police, would’t you remember exactly who you spoke to?  Mrs. Kowal knows everyone on the police force.  More to the point, if someone broke into your office, or your home, and rummaged through locked drawers, would you verbally make someone aware of it, or would you file a written police report?

So what does this incident say?  To us, it says that the statement about filing a report with the police in August was a fallacy.  Further, as Treasurer Viar said, it calls into question the credibility of Mrs. Kowal and Mrs. Manzella about this entire incident.  Could the entire e-mail incident have been a fraud?

During Kowal’s animated rebuttal to Mrs. Filar and Mr. Viar, she feigned concern about the integrity of the FOIA process.  But then admitted that the HR Director is a “quick learner” on the subject of FOIA.

As Kowal said: “Amazingly enough she’s [the HR Director] had no questions whatsoever, it’s just like shocking she’s barely come down and asked me any questions about FOIA so she’s really a quick learner.”

Could this mean that the township’s FOIA process is not as complex as Mrs. Kowal wants us to believe?  Could, just maybe, someone other than Kowal perform these duties and do them properly?  Appears so.

Kowal admitted that she made not one, but two copies of the e-mail.  “If I was going to use that [e-mail] for personal gain I would have put it on Facebook,” Kowal flippantly said.  Doesn’t threatening to put an e-mail on Facebook illustrate some kind of anger toward Mr. Viar?  Or was it a not-so-subtle stab at Manzella who has gained a reputation as Shelby’s Facebook Queen?

Another interesting point from this meeting took place while resident Dub Hearon was speaking.  Kowal said that she spends time training clerks around the state about FOIA.  Mr. Viar then wondered if Kowal is doing all this training for clerks across Michigan on Shelby Township taxpayer time?  Is she getting paid to do her job as clerk, while acting as a teacher for elected officials in other communities?  We will have to explore this issue in greater detail later.

Trustee Mike Flynn then asked for the floor and said that, in his view, the Board made the correct choice in moving the FOIA duties out of the Clerk’s department.

“Clearly we’re having a very politically charged debate here tonight,” Flynn said.  “I think that this illustrates for the public the very reason that the Board got it right, at the last meeting, taking it out of the hands of a politician and putting FOIA into the hands of a neutral party.”

Supervisor Stathakis concluded the discussion by saying that the purpose for the policy change was to make it less tempting to play games for personal reasons.

“All I’m trying to do is remove any temptation from any elected official to get any personal gain from another elected official’s e-mails.  I think this really does a good job in keeping that from happening.”

A vote was taken and the result was four-to-two to modify the FOIA procedure (Trustee Wozniak was absent).  Can you guess who the two votes were who wanted to give the FOIA duties back to Kowal?  Here’s a hint: Kowal and Manzella.

In the wake of all this drama taxpayers are asking: How does any of this stupidity by Manzella and Kowal over a simple FOIA procedure help our township?  Making inflated/false statements about filing police reports and raising allegations about breaking into locked file drawers — or wait, was it cardboard banker boxes, we’re confused!

It has become increasingly clear that while some Board members are concerned about the big issues impacting Shelby Township during these challenging economic times, there are two Board members who focus on small issues (for personal reasons) and could care less about the larger picture of public service.

For example, let’s examine where each Board member stands on the issues that matter most taxpayers:

Supervisor Rick Stathakis.  Mr. Stathakis has been talking about moving Shelby Township forward since his first day as Supervisor.  He is concerned with improving the process for providing services to taxpayers.  He is concerned with reducing costs of service, without impacting the quality of services.  He has also worked to improve internal processes to save money and make the township more fiscally responsible.  He has broadened transparency and accountability.  If you want to see a complete list of the Board’s accomplishments log on to www.rickstathakis.com.

Treasurer Paul Viar.  Mr Viar has been focusing all of his time as Treasurer on cutting spending.  You can’t deny that.  When he is not countering ridiculous recalls or battling retroactive (and punitive) parking tickets, Mr. Viar is fighting for taxpayers.  He has always been a proponent of smaller, more effective, and less expensive government.  Mr. Viar has his critics, primarily those who oppose his conservative Republican policies for running the township.

Recently, Mr. Viar has been educating taxpayers about the costs of union pensions funded with our tax dollars.  Mr. Viar is rightly concerned about the burden these ever-rising pensions will have on our township (and on township taxpayers) unless changes are made to the pension system.  He has fought to increase funding to the pension system, and his plan was dismissed by the previous Supervisor.  Now he is calling for changes to the system to overhaul something that is broken and in desperate need of repair.

Trustees Mike Flynn and Paula Filar.  Both Mrs. Filar and Mr. Flynn have been consistent in their views and votes concerning fiscal responsibility.  Mr. Flynn and Mrs. Filar have discussed reducing township operating costs, improving efficiencies and maintaining quality services for residents.  Both have stood fast by their principles that the township must do more with less during these difficult times.

Trustee Doug Wozniak.  Mr. Wozniak is another conservative voice on the Board.   Mr. Wozniak, as the Board’s representative on the Planning Commission, has been focused on good development for our township.  He may not be the most outspoken Trustee, but he certainly knows what must be done to address the big issues impacting residents.

While the five Board members listed above have been concerned with real-world issues impacting taxpayers, what have the other two Board members been talking about?

Trustee Lisa Manzella.  Mrs. Manzella is, without question, the most LIBERAL member of the Board.  She calls herself a conservative — but real conservatives know the truth about her record.  Manzella has been working to recall other Board members whom she dislikes.  She opposes conservative views and prefers to return to the “glory days” when the township was spending every dollar possible.

As Inside Out readers know, Manzella has a long record of which she proves whose side she is really on:
Manzella posts nasty comments on Facebook, and other websites, attacking fellow Board members and even township residents.  She has now become known as Shelby’s chief elected cyber bully.
 She tells lies about the township canceling the DARE program, which is still in the Utica Schools and performing well.
 She tells lies about the crossing guard situation, saying that the township was “saddled” with the crossing guards as a result of canceling DARE.
 She supports issuing retroactive tickets to residents.  She raised the possibility of the township hiring people to go around snapping photos so that more retroactive tickets can be written.
 She opposed a vote of the people on spending $50 million for a new campus and $20 million for her proposed police/court building.  She said it would be “cowardace” to give this to the people for a vote when she was elected to make this decision.
 She said it is better to spend tax money than save it in the bank.
 She blogs on Facebook during a televised Board meeting to voice her displeasure with Supervisor Stathakis and the Board.  She said that she needed a barf bag.
 She arrogantly compared Supervisor Stathakis to Adolf Hitler.
 She votes, at the October 4th Board meeting, to take FOIA duties away from the Clerk and give it to the HR Department, and then complains at the October 18th meeting about her vote, saying she had not had time to investigate it before voting.
 She complains about the pension system, and posts comments on Facebook lambasting Treasurer Viar for the township’s pension problems.  In Manzella’s little world, Mr. Viar is the cause for the pension dilemma.  Yet, when when confronted about her ideas for making the pension system stronger, as was done by a taxpayer at the October 18th meeting, Manzella’s mind goes blank.  She has no ideas.  She tried to dodge the question.  In the end, all Manzella could do is sing her tired old song blaming Mr. Viar.
 She accuses Supervisor Stathakis of meddling in FOIA procedures, accusations which were publicly discredited at the October 18th meeting.  This is not the first time Manzella has circulated false information, and this is why she is known around Shelby as “Lisa the Liar.”

We encourage you to check out previous Inside Out postings for more detailed information about Manzella’s record.  Read it for yourself.

How does anything that Lisa Manzella says or does help Shelby taxpayers?  How does it help the Board of Trustees better serve the people?  The answer is, it doesn’t.  Now Lisa Manzella is going around telling people that she will run for Shelby Treasurer?

Clerk Terri Kowal.  Mrs. Kowal has been obsessing about the FOIA change so much that this has become the single biggest deal to her since she was first elected to the Board of Trustees way back in 1990.   Allegations of misuse against her as the township’s FOIA coordinator are serious.  She claimed to file a police report over an e-mail tampering incident, but then it comes to light that no such report was ever filed.   Then, Kowal says it was a verbal police report made, but doesn’t remember exactly who she gave it to.

There is much more to say about Terri Kowal, and we will do so at the appropriate time.  However, bear in mind that just like Manzella, Kowal loves creating drama and spending time on issues that do not benefit ordinary taxpayers.  Most of Kowal’s issues involve power plays and political games.  The fact is that Kowal’s priorities do NOTHING to help financially-stressed taxpayers who work hard everyday to pay Kowal’s salary and benefits so she can be out of the office frequently traveling around the state, on taxpayer time, teaching others how to do their job.

Shelby’s Board of Trustees has made great strides over the past three-and-a-half years, despite the screwball antics of Terri Kowal and Lisa Manzella.  This is especially true when you compare our great township to other communities that are raising taxes, closing libraries, laying off police and firefighters and facing trusteeship by the State of Michigan.

There is an enormous difference between elected public servants who understand their duties and want to serve the public (Stathakis, Viar, Filar, Flynn, Wozniak) and those politicians who understand how to stir up political drama so they can serve their own interests (Kowal and Manzella).  We all need to remember this when election day 2012 rolls around.

Until next time...

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Shelby’s Board of Trustees Reassigns FOIA Duties As Allegations of Misuse Surface Against Clerk Terri Kowal

The freedom of information act (FOIA) gives ordinary residents access to documents and information that may otherwise be kept in the dark.  The FOIA laws have also been used by media outlets to gain information that elected officials may otherwise want to keep out of public domain.

Unfortunately, sometimes even something like FOIA gets misused and/or abused.  We are talking about residents who misuse FOIA as a fishing expedition to try and harass elected officials.  We are talking about political candidates who abuse FOIA to try and embarrass their opponents.  We are talking about some elected officials who misuse FOIA to gain access to information that they would otherwise not be privy to.

At the Tuesday, October 4th Board of Trustees meeting, Shelby Township Treasurer Paul Viar made a motion, seconded by Trustee Paula Filar, to take FOIA coordinator duties away from Clerk Terri Kowal.  Under the law, the Board has to designate somebody as the township’s FOIA coordinator.  For whatever reason, the Board (years ago) assigned these duties to the township clerk.

Since Clerk Kowal has been doing this for years, one question that came to our minds is:  “why change it now?”  So we listened and got a clear picture of why the Board wanted to make this FOIA policy change.

During the discussion over the motion, there was an exchange between Treasurer Paul Viar, Trustee Paula Filar and Clerk Terri Kowal concerning FOIA.  Below is a transcript of that conversation:

=====

BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING - 10/4/11

Treasurer Paul Viar.  Mr. Chairman, we’re not really talking about the request for FOIA.  I think we are talking about the results of the request.  What comes back in.  Now, if it is enacted, if the Board sees fit, this would take it out of the hands of elected officials.  Where I think all of us know that in the past, some of the documents that have solicited and delivered have been selectively pulled out of the information and used for different reasons.  We know this to be a fact.  So this would eliminate that type of circumstance that exists today, and that’s why I brought the motion.

Clerk Terri Kowal: I just wanted to point out that I really do appreciate the Board doing this and I appreciate Mr. Viar doing this it will be a great relief for us, especially during election season. I do appreciate it.

And I want to concur with what Mr. Viar is saying.  We had some documents underneath Cheryl’s desk in the Clerk’s department.  There was about, I think, 1,500 sheets of paper or something like that, and the box was one of those bankers boxes with thread around the end, you know string around the ends.  Somebody came into our department, went into that box, went through the 1,500 sheets of paper and redacted two sentences off of an e-mail.  Luckily we had already made a copy of it so we had a copy of it.  We copied the whole thing.  But they actually came into my office and did that.  I had to make a police report because somebody was going through our stuff.

* EDITOR’S NOTE:  Mrs. Kowal filed a police report over a printed e-mail?  Come on, really?  And the clerk complains she is “overworked”?  Could political games like this be one of the excuses why she has such a heavy workload?  People have told us, more than once, that Kowal has a flair for the melodramatic — and they are right.  We would LOVE to see that police report!

Trustee Paula Filar: The e-mail was in a big stack.  It was an e-mail that was in a big stack, and she said some information was retracted from it.  However, one of the issues that I personally have is that that e-mail that she is speaking of had to do with an exchange between Mr. Viar and myself.  It was on a business matter but then there was an exchange that Mrs. Kowal pulled out that e-mail and used it for her personal use and confronted Mr. Viar about that e-mail.  I don’t believe a FOIA coordinator should have access, obviously they have access to information, but they should not be using that information, taking information from the pile and providing it to anyone.  I do know that when asked about it she said that she received it from the resident.  However, the resident never came in and paid for the information so the resident couldn’t have had the information because the resident never paid for it.  I think that’s why…it’s really tempting to use information that you see if you’re an elected official and I think it belongs in the hands of somebody impartial.

Clerk Terri Kowal: I had said, Mr. Chairman, that I was never going to bring this up, ‘cause I really thought it was, like, pretty disgusting.  This is what happened, this is exactly what happened.  Mr. Viar called me about something, we were discussing something, and he said something about the person you ran against me in the last election wants to be on the sidewalk committee.  And I said I’ve never wanted to run anybody against you, not like you, or whatever, I didn’t have anything to do with his race.  And he said I’ve never, ever said a word about running anybody against you in the election.  And I said that’s just not true, I saw it in an e-mail when, for the FOIA.  He said well I don’t believe that’s true show it to me.  So I said okay so I went out to the file with Cheryl and my staff who knew there was nothing redacted, we went through all the sheets, found it, and that sheet had been redacted.  Fortunately that one page had been copied so I took it down, and here’s the thing, here’s why it had been copied, because as Mr. Viar said I’m going to run Stan Grot against the township clerk, he doesn’t like her for some reason and Mrs. Filar said oh that’s really good news...I’m telling what she said, she brought it up, she said well that will really give her a run for her money let’s see how that goes.  That’s exactly what, I’ve got the e-mail, so (and Kowal goes on trying to laugh the issue off as unimportant).

Treasurer Paul Viar: Mr. Chairman, tonight we have an admission that the clerk went into a stack of e-mails that I gave her and pulled out one that [Kowal interjects: “yup I did” ].  This is just as bad as what she did to Mr. Ward [Kowal interjects: “I did” and then laughs about it] or worse.  For her to go into a stack of personal e-mails — personal e-mails — and pull one out of a stack like this [Kowal interjects: “that’s right!”] is beyond comprehension [Kowal interjects: “it is”] of an elected official who has access to this information [Kowal interjects: “that’s right!”]. It shouldn’t happen and that’s exactly why I brought the issue to the Board tonight. [Kowal is heard laughing some more]

Trustee Paula Filar:  Mr. Chairman I would really like to concur.  I think that there are private conversations, they could joking they could be serious, I’m not going to say.  However, in the course of your job, if you have a responsibility to perform a task for the township, and in the course of that you see information that should be confidential, and you take it and you then confront somebody with it, to use it for your own purpose, I think that’s wrong!

=====

The motion made by Treasurer Viar and supported by Trustee Filar passed UNANIMOUSLY.  When you watch the meeting you will hear that Mrs. Kowal’s voice was the LOUDEST vote in support of giving FOIA responsibilities to the township’s Human Resources Director.

When you listen to the discussion, and read the transcript, Clerk Kowal admitted, more than once, that she did do exactly what Mr. Viar was accusing her of doing.  She took one specific e-mail from Mr. Viar from a stack of 1,500 sheets of paper.  She read that e-mail and didn’t like what it said.  So she removed the e-mail from the pile, made a copy of it, and then confronted Treasurer Viar about it.

Kowal complained that the e-mail discussed a potential candidate against her in 2012.  So what?  This is a still a democracy, isn’t it?  Do we have the right to open discussion on anything we want, or should we bow to government censorship?  Does Kowal believe she is entitled to her clerk’s job for as long as she wants it, and that nobody in our township has the right to talk about an opposing candidate?

Trustee Filar addressed Kowal’s comment directly, saying that there are many times when e-mails are exchanged between Board members.  Some are joking remarks, and some are serious.  Was the one about a possible candidate against Kowal a joke?  It really doesn’t matter.  What matters is that Terri Kowal was so outraged by this comment that she actually pulled the e-mail out and confronted Treasurer Viar, to his face, about the remark.  Is this proper conduct for the clerk?  What do you think would happen if anyone else on the Board did this?  Do you think it would be a front page story in the Macomb Daily?

Mr. Viar’s comment above about Shelby resident Mike Ward and his complaints about Kowal’s FOIA conduct was reported in the May 18, 2011 Shelby-Utica Patch.  Kowal came under fire by Ward for allegedly leaking FOIA documents that Ward requested for his legal battle against Trustee Manzella.  As you will recall, Manzella sued Ward after he filed recall petitions against her.  Here is an excerpt from that story:

Kowal said any trustee can gather and release FOIA requests, and she would be happy to give FOIA responsibilities over to another department, citing the amount of work that goes into gathering the information needed.

Ward said he asked the board to put his complaint on the agenda because he wants the people of Shelby Township to know what’s going on behind closed doors.

“You have to be doing a better job than this. You can’t be tipping people off,” Ward said to Kowal.

So even though Kowal said she would “be happy” to give FOIA duties to someone else, now that the Board has granted her wish, she is unhappy?

The October 12, 2011 Shelby-Utica News reported on this township FOIA policy change.  When you read the article, you will note that Clerk Terri Kowal, who voted for the change, is now criticizing the decision.  Here is an excerpt from the Shelby-Utica News story:

Okay, so what’s up with Kowal?  Either the township’s new FOIA policy is good, as Kowal implied when she she said she is overworked and needs less to do, or the new FOIA policy is a “politically-motivated” attack.  If it is politically motivated, as Kowal told the Shelby-Utica News, why didn’t she mention this at the televised Board meeting?  Furthermore, if it is politically motivated, why did Kowal enthusiastically support the policy change with the loudest “aye” vote of anyone on the Board?

There is another interesting dynamic.  Mrs. Kowal was obviously happy to get rid of the FOIA duties, because as she said her department is overworked.  Yet, she also said the department is understaffed, which is government-speak for “I need to hire more people in my department.”  Since the Clerk’s department will now be doing less work since the FOIA responsibilities have been reassigned, why does Kowal want/need to hire more employees?  While other departments are being asked to do more with less — Clerk Terri Kowal wants her department to do less work with more employees?

Digging through thousands of e-mails, reading them, copying them and then using them as a political weapon to confront another person because you don’t like what is written, seems highly inappropriate.  If, as it appears, Mrs. Kowal is reading through township e-mails like this, could this possibly explain why she is, in her own words, overworked?  Is this cybersnooping taking time away from Kowal’s actual duties as clerk?

It appears, from the outside, as though the system has been misused.  If she did this once and got caught, how many other times has Terri Kowal snooped through e-mails and gotten away with it?  Taking FOIA responbilities away from the Clerk, who admitted to taking e-mails and using them for political purposes, and giving them to a non-political person who will follow the law, makes sense.  Mrs. Kowal may think she is the only person who can fulfill FOIA requests, but that claim is overstated.

What is apparent is that, once again, the Save Shelby entitlement syndrome is alive and well.  Mrs. Kowal, who has served on the Shelby Board since 1990 (21 years!), feels so entitled to her clerk’s job that she doesn’t want any talk about other candidates.  So she plays political games with personal e-mails.

Terri Kowal has served on the Shelby Township Board of Trustees for more than two decades.  She was first elected a Trustee in 1990 — a LONG time ago.  Much has changed during those two decades.  When Terri Kowal was first elected to the Board of Trustees:
    • George Herbert Walker Bush was President of the United States.
    • A gallon of regular gasoline cost $1.16.
    • The price of a first class stamp was 25¢.
    • The Dow Jones Industrials closed the year with an average 2,633.
    • Iraqi troops invade Kuwait, launching the Persian Gulf War under George H.W. Bush.
    • The average cost of a new house was $123,000.
    • The Saturn car division was launched by General Motors.
    • Seinfeld debuted on NBC and the Simpsons debuted on Fox.
    • The Hubble Space Telescope was launched into space.

Actually, when you look at the list above, Kowal and the Simpsons are the only two things that have stayed the same during the past 21 years.  What do Kowal and the Simpsons have in common?

Interestingly, one week before the FOIA/e-mail policy made news, Mrs. Kowal was quoted in the Oakland Press still talking about the recent failed township recall against Treasurer Paul Viar and Supervisor Rick Stathakis.  Here we are, nearly four months after the recall was declared dead and buried, and Kowal is still ringing the recall bell.

She was quoted in the September 25, 2011 Oakland Press.  An excerpt appears below:


We understand that Mrs. Kowal supports the “Save Shelby, Status Quo, Liberal Spending Liars Society”.  We recognize that her family supported the failed recall, and that her son and daughter in-law circulated petitions.  Obviously, Kowal and her Save Shelby cohorts are still stinging from this defeat and trying and keep recall talk alive.   That may be important to this small group of people, but the overwhelming majority of Shelby Township residents rejected the recall and have moved on.  We understand what this group tried to do, who tried to do it, and why!

As to Kowal’s remark “you can’t let your votes be personal”, we wish that she would follow her own advice.  Sure, this sounds nice, but the fact remains that for Terri Kowal ALL politics is personal.  She will do anything, and everything, to fulfill HER agenda, including rummaging through another person’s e-mails to find something, anything, to complain about.  Those who have watched the Board of Trustees meetings will agree that when Terri Kowal comes out on the losing end of a issue, especially on something she really believes in, EVERY vote is personal.

Until next time...

Wednesday, October 5, 2011

Trustee Lisa Manzella’s Cyberbullying Demonstrates Conduct Unbecoming A Township Elected Official

Cyberbullying, the act of using computers and related technology (including the Internet) to harm other people in a deliberate, repeated, and hostile manner, is on the rise.

Cyberbullying is, unquestionably, one of the most destructive and disgraceful actions people (of any age) can do to another human being.  Individuals who engage in such reprehensible behavior are insecure, spiteful and vengeful thugs who have a total lack of regard for others.

By now we have all heard or seen stories about cyberbullies and the impact they are having on kids in schools.  You may even know someone who has encountered a cyberbully.  Those who choose to pick on others, spread lies and rumors, and viciously harass others pose a real threat to society — whether this bullying be face-to-face or in cyberspace.

Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette has decided to crackdown on cyberbullying.  He recently launched the “Michigan CSI Internet Safety Program.”  The program, which is an educational and information program conducted in our schools,  addresses consequences associated with the increased prevalence of cyberbullying.  In announcing the program Attorney General Schuette said that given today’s computers and cell phone technology, a child can be bullied anywhere.

That is true.  But cyberbullying is not limited to children.  There are plenty of other people, including adults, who get harassed online.  Perhaps Mr. Schuette should take a look at adults who cyberbully as well?  As for elected officials who engage in this conduct there is a proven way to deal with them — it’s called an ELECTION!


Bullying has definitely become a more complex issue.  No longer limited to playgrounds and other concrete locations, it has expanded with the development of technology to such areas as texts, emails and social networking sites, like Facebook.  Trustee Lisa Manzella is well aware of Facebook, since this is her social media network of choice for smearing, trashing, and slandering her fellow elected officials, as well as township residents.

Previous Inside Out posts have discussed, in detail, how Lisa Manzella, and her fellow Save Shelby culprits, are using the Internet to personally attack our elected officials.   The first one was on June 1, 2011 and the second was written on June 8, 2011.  Both of these posts discuss how Trustee Lisa Manzella and her “Save Shelby, Status Quo, Liberal Spending Liars Society” (a.k.a. Save Shelby) have engaged in a malicious, calculated and personal campaign to destroy the reputations and characters of our elected officials — and anyone who dares oppose the Save Shelby vision for our township.

Why does Manzella engage in such juvenile conduct like using Facebook to air her personal gripes?  Perhaps Manzella feels untouchable, thinking that no one can do anything to stop her.  However, not even Lisa Manzella is above the law.  Her public actions and slanderous comments pose serious problems for her.  Cyberbullying is cyberbullying — regardless of your age.

Below are some of Lisa Manzella’s Facebook posts which illustrate how she has transformed herself from a public servant into a public embarrassment:


Yes, Manzella has the right to free speech.  However, just as you can’t scream fire in a crowded theater, not all Facebook posts have been deemed as meeting the test of free speech.  You can’t bully or harass people.  You can’t spread malicious lies about people.  And you can’t publicly defame people.  This is especially true for public officials who are held to a higher standard of conduct.

Bowling alleys?  Residents who regularly watch the Board of Trustees meetings know that the only people who have engaged in “bowling alley” conduct over the last several months are Save Shelby members who have repeatedly screamed, talked out of turn, and used words like “jackass” to describe the Board.  This includes Nick “the loudmouth” Nightingale, who has consistently shown a total lack of respect for the Board and for proper conduct during meetings.  Now Nick Nightingale wants to run for township Trustee?

By attacking township Board members, Manzella may think she and her Save Shelby clowns are throwing strikes.  However, what they are actually throwing are gutter balls.

Speaking of the gutter, check out this Facebook post:

Nasty and vile is perhaps the perfect way to describe Manzella’s Facebook attacks.  Calling residents “small minded” and a “pedophile” certainly crosses the line of reasonable conduct for an elected official.  Again, Manzella may think she is being cute, but her ugly comments show her dark side.

This is not the first time Manzella has attacked township residents.  Check out this post:

Calling someone a “big fat ass” is sure to win you votes, don’t you think?  Hey “big fat ass” vote for me!  A new Manzella campaign tactic?

Anyway, does Manzella’s comment that she doesn’t have to be nice to people, and that she doesn’t want our votes, reflect the character of someone fit to serve the residents of Shelby Township?  Or, does it reflect the disjointed thinking of someone who should do us all a favor and just resign?

Also, complaints by Val Alspaugh, Tom Delise, Lisa Manzella and other Save Shelby cronies that the Inside Out does not include opposing viewpoints have no merit.  This blog alone stands as proof that we do, indeed, include comments from the “other side.”  We have done so repeatedly and will continue reprinting Facebook posts because it is vital that all residents see for themselves what Lisa Manzella and her Save Shelby crew are saying about our community.

However, just as we include these comments, we also reserve the right to offer our comments and point out the lies, distortions and misinformation being circulated by the “Save Shelby, Status Quo, Liberal Spending Liars Society.”

Moving on, here is another posting by Lisa Manzella:
Referring to the Supervisor as “Stathasskiss”, as Manzella has done (probably more than once), is surely no way to build teamwork on the Board, is it?  Since she has worked to disrupt the “team”, what right does Manzella have to even mention teamwork?

Given conduct like this, Manzella then has the audacity to complain when people criticize her foolish antics.  She loves to play the victim card, and her famous claim to fame is that she is being picked on by “bullies.”  Actually, Manzella is the biggest bully of all who enjoys starting fights.

Here is another attack upon Supervisor Rick Stathakis:

Beyond just another senseless and useless rant, this Manzella Facebook post makes no sense.  Okay, so Manzella missed a Board meeting.  It wasn’t the first time she has been absent.  Then she goes on to complain about the meeting she didn’t attend?  She probably took the word of her political mentor, Clerk Terri Kowal, or some Save Shelby gang member’s interpretation, and then decided to log on Facebook and start typing.

Now, let’s examine some of Lisa Manzella’s attacks upon Treasurer Paul Viar:

Treasurer Paul Viar has been trying to expose the problem with union pensions for years.    However, at every turn he has been attacked for pointing out these unsustainable, budget-busting pensions.  Manzella has joined in this attack against Treasurer Viar, calling his campaign to educate voters about pensions an unnecessary “rant.”

Why is Lisa Manzella unconcerned about skyrocketing costs of union pensions?  Why does she want to silence Treasurer Viar from telling taxpayers what they are paying, and how much these pensions will cost us today and in the future?  Is it because she quietly supports the Save Shelby idea that the way to deal with the budget problems is to raise taxes?  Since some Save Shelby people want to raise them (if needed), does Manzella share this idea?

When Manzella’s friend Skip Maccarone was calling the shots, Mr. Viar wanted to add more money to help pay down the pension deficit.   Those were the days when the economy was strong and the township was bringing in money, thanks to rising property values.  However, Maccarone and Manzella opposed that idea, preferring to spend all available money possible — every single tax dollar — for their grand “campus.”  This included a $20 million police/court building, and a $50 million campus of new buildings.  Remember, Manzella has said publicly that it is better to spend tax money than save it in the bank.

As Manzella and Maccarone saw it, Shelby taxpayers were supposed to just pay their higher tax bills and “trust“ their elected officials to do the right thing when it came to spending money for the “campus.”  Remember, Manzella and Maccarone didn’t even want taxpayers to vote on the millions in new bonds that would have been required to build the Manzella/Maccarone campus!  “Hey everyone,  just pay the bills and shut up.  We were elected to decide how to spend the money.”

If you doubt what we say about Manzella and her "no vote on bonds" position, here is what she wrote to resident Ed Young about this on Tuesday, March 28, 2006.  FYI...we have the entire letter and if you would like to see it send us an e-mail and we will forward you the Manzella/Young PDF:

“I took the judicial center under my wing because I firmly believe it is a necessity.  I believe the time is now to complete this project.  I was elected by the people to make decisions, and I believe it is an act of cowardace to throw this back at the people.  Only a self-serving official who has their own interest, would be coward enough not to act on the police and court building.  I can’t speak to all of the projects that may or may not seek voter approval, however I see no reason to go to the voters for the new police and court facility....  The board was elected to make financial decisions for the community.  I will not toss a difficult decision back to the residents to avoid making a decision.”


That about sums it up!

Reading on some more:

Manzella is talking about the recall meeting by the Save Shelby/Nightingales held at Nick’s 22nd Street Steakhouse.  Whenever Manzella gets upset she puts her fingers on a computer keyboard and starts ranting.  She either doesn’t have a self-censor button, or doesn’t know how to use it.  Publicly saying that Mr. Viar has “sundowners” is an attack on Mr. Viar’s age — and quite possibly demonstrates ageism by Manzella.

What is ageism?
AGEISM: prejudice or discrimination against a particular age-group and especially the elderly.

Here is yet another Facebook attack on Mr. Viar.  This time, Manzella is comparing the Treasurer to the respected journalist Andy Rooney – another elderly gentleman.  Is this another ageist attack?

The last comment, about Vavro supplying barf bags, is sure to upset family and friends of Robert Vavro.   Mr. Vavro is another senior citizen who disagrees with Manzella’s dirty political games and comes to Board meetings to speak.

Here is another swipe at Treasurer Viar, once again concerning his age:

Do Lisa Manzella’s possible ageist comments serve some purpose?  Or does she simply revel in acting foolish,  stupid and discriminatory on Facebook?

When township resident Bob Vavro attempted to read this posting at the Tuesday, October 4th Board meeting, Treasurer Paul Viar stopped him.  “This is not an X-rated show” is what Mr. Viar said.

When you read the post you can understand why Mr. Viar would be concerned that school students who may be watching the Board meeting for a civics project may be offended by the comment.  “Mommy what does it mean when she said the only thing he can get up is his blood pressure?”  Obviously, Manzella does not give a damn about the audience she represents and feels she can say and write anything she wants about anyone.

Now, check out this Manzella post which compares Supervisor Stathakis to the leader of the Nazi regime, Adolf Hitler:
To our amazement, Manzella actually compared Supervisor Stathakis to Hitler.  Offensive comments like this should be restricted to talks between bowlers after a few drinks.  It should not be posted on Facebook as the official view of a township elected official. 

As discussed in our July 12, 2011 Inside Out, it is clear that Mrs. Manzella has consistently used the Internet to smear people who she disagrees with, especially on issues regarding taxing and spending.  Her favorite targets in these have been Supervisor Stathakis and Treasurer Viar. 

However, Manzella has also stupidly attacked Trustee Mike Flynn.  Check out the following:
When we first saw this post it made no sense.  What is Danny O’Day doing on Save Shelby’s Facebook page?  However, once Manzella’s recall puppet, Tom Delise, chimed in with his “That's MF guy" we made the connection.  Delise/Manzella were referring to Trustee Mike Flynn, and calling him a dummy.  Well, the truth is that the biggest dummies in Shelby, as shown by their failed recall campaigns, are Tom Delise and his string-puller Lisa Manzella.

Below is another Facebook posting which not only, once again, attacks Supervisor Stathakis, but also spreads lies about DARE and the school crossing guards — two unrelated issues Save Shelby used during their recall campaign to try and trick people into signing petitions.  

Lisa Manzella either knew this was false when she wrote it, but decided to write it anyway (a lie), or she didn’t know this statement was untrue, even though it was blatantly obvious (upon reviewing Board of Trustees minutes) that DARE and the crossing guards were unrelated items.  We believe Manzella knew it was false, but conned her Save Shelby associates into repeating the lie to try and discredit the Board.  In the end, it was Manzella and Save Shelby who ended up being discredited for their pack of lies.

We discussed the crossing guard issue, and Save Shelby’s pack of lies about it, in our April 22, 2011 Inside Out.  Check it out and decide for yourself if Manzella is a liar.

Concerning charitable work, Manzella is wrong!  Supervisor Stathakis supports various charities.  He just goes about it quietly, and doesn’t seek publicity.  Manzella, on the other hand, actively sniffs out cameras and reporters to tout her activities.

Facebook is not the only medium that Manzella has used to spread her venom.  She has become a regular poster on the Shelby-Utica Patch website.  Here is one of her comments which says volumes about Trustee Lisa Manzella, and her BS about how grateful she is to serve our township:

When you read that comment above, and put it in perspective with everything else, it is clear that Lisa Manzella is tired of serving on the Board of Trustees.  When Skip Maccarone lost the election in 2008, Manzella really took it hard.  She never got over it.  Instead, she made a conscious decision to try and  slander, smear and defame the Board of Trustees.  What a damn shame!

Below is another post taken from the Shelby-Utica Patch.  This one discusses the spending of $50 million for Manzella’s campus scheme:

As you will see, Manzella even takes another swing at Treasurer Paul Viar (another ageist comment?), this time calling the Treasurer “senile.”

And here is yet another classic Manzellian post from the Shelby-Utica Patch:


In this post, Manzella goes to bat for the failed recall, and supports her friends the Nightingales, the key organizers of the recall.  She also brazenly calls a resident “unphotogenic.”  The pot calling the kettle black?

Finally, here is one more Facebook post which is sure to call into question Manzella’s mental state:
Perhaps the next time Manzella goes bargain hunting at Barnes and Nobles she should pick up a few more books off the clearance racks.  Judging from what we hear, Lisa Manzella is sure to have plenty of spare time when voters give her an unceremonious kick in the behind when we remove her from public office in 2012.

When that day of reckoning finally arrives, Lisa Manzella will then be remembered as just another one of those“bullies, creeps, jerks, tyrants, backstabbers and egomaniacs and all the other assholes” who tried to destroy our township and tried to push their own personal agenda, but who ended up getting dumped by voters sickened by their negative actions.

Facebook is a truly remarkable way to communicate in the 21st Century.  However, as is the case with everything in life, there are always going to be people who take something meant for good, and use it for bad.  Such is the case with Trustee Lisa Manzella and Facebook.

Until next time...